Improving the Reliable Change Index for Identifying Dementia: moving from linear to beta-binomial models

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Since linear models are not the most appropriate model for discrete, bounded scores, we compared the beta-binomial (BB) and linear Reliable Chage Index (RCI) to identify progressors to dementia over 13 years among those scoring at the lowest extreme at baseline. METHODS: We calculated the one-year RCI using data from the ASPREE trial (n=15,821), splitting the sample into two halves for cross-validation. Different incidences of dementia (4%, 10%) and standardized mean difference (SMD) between cases and controls (-0.5SD, -0.7SD, -1SD, -1.5SD) were analyzed. Models were compared with the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: Overall, the BB model showed a better AIC than the linear. Across 8,000 random replications, the BB showed a higher positive predictive value in 70%-90% of the cross-validation samples (up to 35% higher), varying for different incidences and SMD. DISCUSSION: The BB model identifies more accurately than the linear model individuals with the greatest risk of progression to dementia.

Article activity feed