Advancing psychiatry with transdiagnostic targets for digital phenotyping

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Importance Smartphone sensors can continuously and unobtrusively collect clinically relevant behavioral data, allowing for more precise symptom monitoring in clinical and research settings. However, progress in identifying unique behavioral markers of psychopathology from smartphone sensors has been stalled by research on diagnostic categories that are heterogenous and have many non-specific symptoms.Objective Determine which domains of psychopathology are detectable with smartphone sensors and identify passively sensed markers for (1) general impairment (the p-factor) and (2) specific transdiagnostic domains.Design Observational study including a baseline assessment and 14 days of smartphone monitoring.Setting Selected community sample.Participants Participants included 557 adults selected for mental health treatment status (51% currently in outpatient treatment, 29% with treatment history).Main outcomes and measures Transdiagnostic psychopathology dimensions of internalizing, detachment, disinhibition, antagonism, thought disorder, somatoform, and the p-factor; 27 behavior markers derived from GPS, accelerometer, motion, call logs, screen on/off, and battery status.Results Among the 557 participants included in the study, 82% were female and the mean age was 30.7 (SD = 8.8). Multiple correlation (R) showed the domain most strongly related to sensed behavior was detachment (R = .42) followed by somatoform (R = .41), internalizing (R = .37), disinhibition (R = .35), antagonism (R = .33), and thought disorder (R = .28). Each psychopathology domain had significant, bivariate associations with 4-10 smartphone sensor variables. After adjusting for shared variance between psychopathology dimensions, all domains except thought disorder retained significant, incremental associations with sensor variables, reflecting unique behavioral signatures (standardized s = |.15|–|.25|). The p-factor was associated with lower mobility, more time at home, later bedtime, and less phone charge (s = |.12|–|.24|).Conclusions and relevance This study identified behavioral markers for domains encompassing most major forms of psychopathology using smartphone sensor data. In addition to establishing the breadth of psychopathology that is detectable, findings show smartphone sensors assess markers that distinguish domains of dysfunction. Results showing many behavioral markers reflect non-specific psychopathology reinforces the need for dimensional, transdiagnostic models to maximize the potential of mobile sensing technology. Findings from this study can advance research on day-to-day maintenance mechanisms of psychopathology and inform development of symptom monitoring tools.

Article activity feed