The Construct Validity of Automated Written Interview Competency Assessments

We report evidence on the construct validity of automated written interview competency assessments (AWI-CAs). Participants (N = 117) provided written responses to 12 open-ended interview questions designed to assess four behavioral competencies (Collaboration, Communication, Leadership, Critical Thinking) along with a neutral question. Responses were scored by a large language model (LLM) on an 11-point scale. Scores were substantially intercorrelated, including correlations with the neutral question, suggesting substantial common method variance. Accordingly, we partialled out the neutral-question score from each behavioral question. Principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation yielded a three-factor solution: Communication and Leadership loaded on a common factor, whereas Collaboration and Critical Thinking formed distinct factors. In addition, the Communication/Leadership factor was primarily associated with Open-Mindedness, the Collaboration factor with Conscientiousness, and the Critical Thinking factor with verbal reasoning. Overall, these findings support the construct validity of automated behavioral interviews beyond a general response tendency.