Critical Evaluation of Sudhakar's ESR-Integrated Method for Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

A cradle-to-gate assessment of Sudhakar’s ESR-integrated recycling reveals 35% lower GHG emissions (2.1 kg CO₂/kg metal) than pyrometallurgy but 12% higher energy intensity (9 vs. 6 kWh/kg Co). While achieving battery-grade Co/Ni (99.2% purity), the method recovers only 68% Li versus 80% in hydrometallurgy. Slag byproduct characterization shows 92% suitability as cement additive (ASTM C989), potentially offsetting disposal costs. System viability hinges on regional factors: ESR is optimal where electricity <$0.055/kWh and Co prices >$18/kg, favoring Quebec and Nordic regions over China or Germany. Description: A cradle-to-gate assessment reveals: Pros: 35% lower CO₂ than pyrometallurgy Direct alloy production for cathode precursors Cons: Li recovery requires supplemental solvent extraction Slag disposal costs ($50/ton in EU) Policy alignment: Meets 2027 EU Battery Regulation’s 90% recycling target for Co/Ni

Article activity feed