Do 3D Dynamic Rupture Models Capture the Variability in Long-Period Velocity Pulses? Insights from the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Capturing ground motion variability, especially in near-fault long-period velocity pulses, is a key challenge for seismic hazard assessment. Empirical methods often rely on simplified assumptions and may not fully capture the non-linear interplay of source, path, and site effects. Physics-based dynamic rupture simulations offer a self-consistent alternative, but their ability to reproduce variability in near-fault ground motions, such as velocity pulse orientation, period, and amplitude, remains uncertain. We systematically investigate the effect of fault geometry and on-fault heterogeneities in a suite of 3D dynamic rupture simulations of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, earthquake. We compare dynamic rupture scenarios that separately incorporate large-scale fault waviness, fractal fault roughness, heterogeneous critical slip-weakening distance, heterogeneous dynamic friction, and supershear versus subshear initiation, each resolving up to at least ~1 Hz. We systematically analyse the influence on rupture dynamics, frequency content, and long-period pulse variability, while ensuring all models have comparable seismic moment rate release. While all models capture near-fault pulse amplitude variability, supershear initiation and fracture energy heterogeneity exert the strongest influence on pulse period and orientation. Despite added complexity, most modelled pulses remain predominantly fault-normal, contrasting observed broader ranges of orientations, but supershear rupture speed locally increases variability in pulse orientation. We discuss a simpler main fault model incorporating >700 off-fault fractures, which increases variability in both pulse amplitude and orientation, highlighting the importance of fault zone complexity. Incorporating both heterogeneous on-fault frictional properties and off-fault complexity is promising for advancing realistic, non-ergodic ground motion models and physics-based seismic hazard assessment.

Article activity feed