Mutual interactions between aquifer thermal energy storage and groundwater extraction: global sensitivity insights

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) is increasingly deployed in groundwater protection zones, motivating a quantitative assessment of thermal impacts on public-supply wells and the influence of supply-well pumping on ATES performance. In the Campine Basin (Belgium), we simulate three settings: balanced operation, seasonal imbalance, and multi-system deployment. Using a groundwater flow and heat-transport model. Uncertainty in hydrogeological properties and operational settings is represented with Latin Hypercube sampling, and distance-based Generalized Sensitivity Analysis (DGSA) ranks parameter sensitivity for both supply-well temperature disturbance (ΔTsupply) and ATES recovery efficiency. Supply-well ΔTsupply decreases with distance but can exceed natural seasonal variability at close spacing, particularly under imbalance and dense layouts. In the near field (≤75 m), range ΔTsupply is mainly controlled by ATES throughput and seasonal imbalance under pumping-induced convection from ATES cycling superimposed on continuous supply-well abstraction. At larger distances (≥200 m), variability is governed primarily by conductivity contrasts, porosity, and dispersivity, together with regional flow and the supply-well induced hydraulic gradient. Strong background flow and short spacing reduce recovery efficiency, and multi-system cases show cumulative plume interference. For the Campine Basin and similar hydrogeological settings, the results support site-specific setback design, operational constraints, and monitoring requirements, and the same workflow can be applied to other aquifers to derive locally appropriate permitting guidance.

Article activity feed