The Unequal Challenge of Learning from Under-informative News

Political news consumption is highly uneven today: few people consume from news outlets directly, while many encounter news incidentally through social media and aggregators. Because outlets depend on direct consumers for revenue, they respond primarily to this core audience’s preferences. Several contemporary styles of news coverage—which emphasize partisan conflict, employ specialized jargon, engage in predictive analysis, and use clickbait language—are attractive to core consumers, but may also make news less accessible for others. In a preregistered survey experiment (n = 2,233), I show that, relative to a “public interest” style which prioritizes key information about policy and democratic norms, typical news styles weaken post-exposure recall of key news information—that is, they are “under-informative.” Recall penalties are especially severe for those with lower baseline political engagement, yet still affect highly-engaged consumers as well. This study shows that contemporary approaches to news coverage broadly under-serve the public by inhibiting political learning.