Comparison of Stochastic Forecasting Models

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

In this work, we compare several stochastic forecasting techniques like Stochastic Differential Equations (SDE), ARIMA, the Bayesian filter, Geometric Brownian motion (GBM), and the Kalman filter. We use historical daily stock prices of Microsoft (MSFT), Target (TGT) and Tesla (TSLA) and apply all algorithms to try to predict 54 days ahead. We find that there are instances in which all algorithms do well, or do poorly. We find that all three stocks have a strong auto-correlation and a high Hurst factor which shows that it is possible to predict future prices based on a short history of past prices. In the geometric Brownian motion model, there are two parameters for drift and diffusion which are not time dependent. In our more general SDE model (TDNGBM), we have time-dependent drift and time-dependent diffusion terms which makes it more effective than GBM. We measure all algorithms on the correlation between the predicted and actual values, and the mean absolute error (MAE) and we also report confidence intervals generated by the methods. Confidence intervals are more important than point forecasts, and we see that TDNGBM and ARIMA produce good bounds.

Article activity feed