Controls From Above or Below? The Influence of Entangled Climate and Land Characteristics on Hydrological Dynamics in Headwater Catchments
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Abstract Although the importance of dynamic water storage and flowpath partitioning on discharge behavior has been well recognized within the critical zone community, there is still little consensus surrounding the question, “ How do climate factors from above and land characteristics from below dictate dynamic storage, flowpath partitioning, and ultimately regulate hydrological dynamics ?” Answers to this question have been hindered by limited and inconsistent spatio-temporal data and arduous-to-measure subsurface data. Here we aim to answer this question above by using a semi-distributed hydrological model (HBV model) to simulate and understand the dynamics of water storage, groundwater flowpaths, and discharge in 15 headwater catchments across the contiguous United States. Results show that topography, precipitation falling as snow, and catchment soil texture all influence catchment dynamic storage, storage-discharge sensitivity, flowpath partitioning, and discharge flashiness. Flat, rain-dominated sites (< 30% precipitation as snow) with finer soils exhibited flashier discharge regimes than catchments with coarse soils and/or significant snowfall (>30% precipitation as snow). Rain-dominated sites with clay soils (indicative of chemical weathering) showed lower dynamic storage and discharge that was more sensitive to changes in dynamic storage than rainy sites with coarse soils. Steep, snowy sites with coarse soils (more mechanical weathering) had lowest dynamic storage and deep groundwater fed discharge that was less sensitive to changes in dynamic storage than fine-soil snowy or rainy catchments. These results highlight aridity and precipitation (snow versus rain) as the dominant climate controls from above and topography and soil texture as the dominant land controls from below. The study challenges the traditional view that climate controls water balance while subsurface structure dictates subsurface flow path. Rather, it shows that climate and land characteristics jointly regulate water balance, groundwater flowpath partitioning, and discharge responses. These findings have important implication for the projection of the future of water resources, especially as climate change and human activities continue to intensify.