Safety and Efficacy of Modular Digital Psychotherapy for Social Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Social anxiety disorder is a common mental health condition characterized by an intense fear of social situations that can lead to significant impairment in daily life. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been recognized as an effective treatment; however, access to therapists is limited, and the fear of interacting with therapists can delay treatment seeking. Furthermore, not all individuals respond. Tailoring modular treatments to individual cognitive profiles may improve efficacy. We developed a novel digital adaptation of CBT for social anxiety that is both modular and fully digital without a therapist in the loop and implemented it in the smartphone app Alena.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and efficacy of the new treatment in online participants with symptoms of social anxiety.
Methods
In total, 2 web-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing individuals with access to the treatment through the app to a waitlist control group were conducted. Participants were recruited on the web and reported Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) total scores of ≥30. Primary outcomes were safety and efficacy over 6 weeks in 102 women aged 18 to 35 years (RCT 1) and symptom reduction (SPIN scores) after 8 weeks in 248 men and women aged 18 to 75 years (RCT 2).
Results
In RCT 1, active and control arm adverse event frequency and severity were not distinguishable (intervention: 7/52, 13%; waitlist control: 8/50, 16%; χ21=0.007; P=.93). App acceptability was high, with a median completion rate of 90.91% (IQR 54.55%-100%). Secondary outcomes suggested greater symptom reduction in the active arm (mean SPIN score reduction −9.83, SD 12.80) than in the control arm (mean SPIN score reduction −4.13, SD 11.59; t90=−2.23; false discovery rate P=.04; Cohen d=0.47). RCT 2 replicated these findings. Adverse event frequency was comparable across the 2 groups (intervention: 20/124, 16.1%; waitlist control: 21/124, 16.8%; χ21<0.001; P>.99). Despite a longer treatment program, median completion remained high (84.85%, IQR 51.52%-96.97%). SPIN score reduction was greater in the active arm (mean −12.89, SD 13.87) than in the control arm (mean −7.48, SD 12.24; t227=−3.13; false discovery rate P=.008; Cohen d=0.42).
Conclusions
The web-only, modular social anxiety CBT program appeared safe, acceptable, and efficacious in 2 independent RCTs on online patient groups with self-reported symptoms of social anxiety.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05858294; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05858294 (RCT 1) and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05987969; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05987969 (RCT 2)