Covid-19 Pandemic-Related Stress and Coping Strategies Among Adults with Chronic Disease in Southwest Ethiopia

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.14.20174318: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    For further analysis, the data were exported to Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 software.
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This finding is similar with the previous study which conducted among chronic condition and disability were used very unlikely of substance use and denial types of coping[10] and it also consistent with world health organization recommendation and center of disease control for coping of stress during covid-19 outbreak [4] The main limitations of this study were shortage of time period for data collection which occurred due the data need urgency and the others limitation was lack of validated and reliable tools for perceived stress and coping strategies for this vulnerable groups. However some data quality control mechanisms were conducted to minimize this limitation effects on the study. Lack of previous studies also one of the main limitations. The main significance of assessment of COVID-19 related perceived stresses and coping strategy types are a paramount at several levels. One of it could be to give appropriate intervention types for COVID-19 related perceived stresses and coping strategy types of the patients about covid-19. In addition, it could provide sufficient data for any concerning body like health professionals, psychologist, policy makers and planers in advising the most vulnerable population for prevention and control of COVID-19 physiological and psychological impacts timely and appropriately. It could fill the information gap of the study area and it would be provide a base line information for others researcher to conduct similar study by considering the l...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.