Virtual Handover of Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit During the Covid-19 Crisis
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
No abstract available
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.24.21252145: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the institutional review board of King Saud University (approval # 20/0553/IRB).
IRB: Following institutional review board approval, data were collected over two weeks (July 1, 2020 to July 14, 2020).Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Respondent Position Specialty Gender Age Number of previous range online endorsements 1 Resident Others Female 31-35 5 2 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 3 3 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 5 4 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 1 5 Resident Pediatrics Female 41-45 9 6 Specialist PICU Male … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.24.21252145: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the institutional review board of King Saud University (approval # 20/0553/IRB).
IRB: Following institutional review board approval, data were collected over two weeks (July 1, 2020 to July 14, 2020).Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Respondent Position Specialty Gender Age Number of previous range online endorsements 1 Resident Others Female 31-35 5 2 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 3 3 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 5 4 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 1 5 Resident Pediatrics Female 41-45 9 6 Specialist PICU Male 46-50 50 7 Specialist PICU Male 41-45 10 8 Specialist PICU Male 31-35 10 9 Consultant PICU Male 46-50 15 10 Consultant PICU Male 51-55 10 11 Consultant PICU Male 36-40 14 12 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 6 13 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 2 14 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 4 15 Fellow PICU Male 31-35 10 16 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 4 17 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 4 18 Specialist PICU Female 41-45 9 19 Consultant PICU Male 36-40 1 20 Specialist PICU Male 41-45 8 21 Specialist PICU Male 36-40 8 22 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 4 23 Fellow Others Male 41-45 2 24 Consultant PICU Male 31-35 7 25 Resident Pediatrics Male 31-35 4 26 Fellow Others Male 31-35 1 27 Resident Pediatrics Female 41-45 >10 28 Consultant PICU Male 46-50 15 29 Resident Pediatrics Male 31-35 4 30 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 4 31 Specialist PICU Male 31-35 12 32 Resident Pediatrics Female 31-35 1 33 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 2 34 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 2 35 Resident Pediatrics Female 26-30 2 36 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 4 37 Resident Pediatrics Male 26-30 6 Table 2. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Even though most participants were post-graduate residents, one possible limitation is their high turnaround, and they may not grasp the whole experience. Implementing virtual handover and telemedicine at other clinical areas within the scope of their rotations may provide additional experience and perspective, which should be further evaluated. Residents’ and trainees’ opinions on Zoom’s use in the clinical practice during the COVID-19 crisis were wildly varied, which is common in narrative analyses (41). A recent cross- sectional survey that evaluated post-graduate residents’ knowledge on infection prevention and control practices did not show any difference in overall knowledge by age, residency year, or rotating department (42). Some of our training residents thought the whole endorsement process does not affect the patient care in the PICU, thinking that this relates more to the PICU senior staff themselves rather than relating to the trainees. This misconception highlights that training residents need more education on how proper endorsement affects the quality of patient care and safety (43). Having all PICU team members share the handover information about a patient’s current situation, assessments, and care recommendations could prevent near misses and adverse events (43). Unfortunately, such vital information does not always pass flawlessly from the previous to the subsequent healthcare providers. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has reported several g...
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
