Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.06.21258091: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: STUDY SETTINGS, DESIGN, AND POPULATION: The study was a single-center, open-label, parallel-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India between March 2020 to October 2020 after obtaining approval of Institutional Ethics Committee.
    Sex as a biological variableExclusion criteria included: patients on medications which were contraindicated with lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, or ribavirin; patients taking lopinavir-ritonavir based anti-retroviral therapy or on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine or ribavirin; known allergic reactions to any of the drugs used in the treatment arms; inability to take oral medications (lopinavir-ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine/ chloroquine, ribavirin); pregnant or lactating females; patients who had received any of the experimental therapies for 2019-nCoV (off-label, compassionate use, or trial-related) within 30 days before participation in the present study.
    RandomizationSTUDY SETTINGS, DESIGN, AND POPULATION: The study was a single-center, open-label, parallel-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India between March 2020 to October 2020 after obtaining approval of Institutional Ethics Committee.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.