Diagnostic Accuracy of Point‑of‑Care Ultrasound versus Neck Radiography for Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Complementary Roles in a Resource‑Limited Triage Pathway

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) causes life-threatening airway obstruction, but computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy, the diagnostic reference standards, are often unavailable in low- and middle-income countries. This prospective study compared point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and soft tissue neck X-ray (XR) against CT to guide an anatomy-based triage pathway for resource-limited settings. This observational diagnostic accuracy study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202510808811458; 06/10/2025). Among 148 patients with suspected LTS, CT confirmed clinically significant stenosis (≥ 50% narrowing) in 99 (66.9%). For overall LTS diagnosis, XR had 93.9% sensitivity and 98.0% specificity. POCUS had 91.9% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity. However, performance varied by airway region. POCUS was more sensitive at the glottis (80.0% versus 26.4% for XR), whereas XR was superior at the thoracic inlet (66.7% versus 0% for POCUS). POCUS was non-diagnostic for the thoracic trachea. Inter-operator reliability was excellent for transverse cervical measurements but lower for glottic and anteroposterior measurements. In a pragmatic analysis counting indeterminate results as test failures, the diagnostic yield of POCUS at the thoracic inlet was 0%. In conclusion, POCUS and neck XR have high overall accuracy for LTS, offering complementary strengths. In settings without CT or endoscopy, an anatomy-guided algorithm using these low-cost tests could reduce diagnostic delays and improve equitable access to care. Prospective validation of this algorithm is required before widespread implementation.

Article activity feed