Comparison of a Ketogenic Diet Program to the ADA Standards of Care in Patients Living with Diabetes: A Randomised Crossover Trial

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background : Ketogenic diets have shown promise for glycaemic control, but studies on the added benefits of strict carbohydrate intake reduction among rigorously controlled patients remain limited. Methods : We conducted a pre-registered, open-label, randomised crossover trial comparing a ketogenic meal program (Glyvance™, <50 g carbohydrates/day) to meals based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations (~190 g carbohydrates/day). The protocol consisted of a 2-day baseline, two 5-day dietary intervention periods, and a 2-day washout between periods. The primary outcome was daily mean glucose measured via continuous glucose monitoring. Secondary outcomes included time in range (70-180 mg/dL) and satiety. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. All meals for both arms were provided, and adherence was defined as > 80% of the meals without any additional foods from what was provided. Results : In the intention-to-treat analysis (n=17), Glyvance™ significantly reduced daily mean glucose by 20 mg/dL compared to baseline (p<0.001). Contrastingly, the ADA diet did not show a significant effect. For patients with Pre-Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes (n=11), Glyvance™ reduced glucose by 23 mg/dL (p<0.001) and the ADA diet by 9 mg/dL (p=0.01). In the per-protocol analysis, for patients with Pre-Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes, both diets improved time in range, Glyvance™ (4.3%, p<0.001) and the ADA diet (2.4%, p=0.008). No diet-sequence effects were observed in any of the analyses. Conclusions : Glyvance™ , a door-delivered ketogenic meal program, achieved superior glycaemic outcomes compared to ADA-based meals in well-controlled patients living with diabetes and pre-diabetes. These findings support further research on its potential as an effective intervention for diabetes management.

Article activity feed