Beyond Cardiology's Pillars: A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix/RZV) with SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Dementia in Adults Aged ≥50 Years

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and dementia represents the foremost challenge in ageing populations. Two drug classes sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are established pillars of cardiometabolic protection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or established cardiovascular disease. Concurrently, converging observational, quasi-experimental, and mechanistic data have positioned the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV; Shingrix, GSK) as a pleiotropic longevity intervention acting via immunological, neuroprotective, and vasculoprotective pathways. No comparative synthesis has directly positioned RZV against these pharmacological benchmarks across both MACE and dementia endpoints. Objective To perform a pre-registered systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing RZV, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA individually and in combination for relative effectiveness in preventing MACE and incident dementia in adults aged ≥ 50 years, regardless of diabetic status, with an integrated assessment of biological mechanism breadth, population generalisability, and health-economic efficiency. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and LILACS were searched from 2000 to March 2026. Eligible studies reported MACE or dementia outcomes in adults ≥ 50 years for at least one of three intervention classes (RZV, SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA) versus placebo or active comparator, with follow-up ≥ 6 months. Random-effects NMA used a Bayesian hierarchical framework (JAGS 4.3.1). Surface-under-the-cumulative-ranking (SUCRA) curves ranked each intervention. Transitivity was evaluated via meta-regression on key effect modifiers including diabetic status, baseline cardiovascular risk, and age. Evidence certainty was rated using GRADE-NMA. Results Ninety-three studies (N > 4,200,000) met inclusion criteria. For MACE prevention, SUCRA analysis ranked RZV highest overall when the general population (≥ 50 years, irrespective of diabetic status) was the reference frame: RZV SUCRA 0.83 (NMA-HR 0.82, 95% CrI 0.76–0.88), GLP-1 RA SUCRA 0.71 (NMA-HR 0.86, 95% CrI 0.80–0.92), SGLT2i SUCRA 0.68 (NMA-HR 0.87, 95% CrI 0.82–0.93). In the diabetic sub-group, SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA performed comparably to RZV. For dementia prevention, RZV demonstrated the most robust and consistent evidence (NMA-RR 0.82, 95% CrI 0.75–0.88; GRADE: HIGH), with vascular dementia showing the largest magnitude (RR 0.50, 95% CrI 0.38–0.65). SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA showed modest dementia signals (pooled HR 0.87 and 0.85, respectively; GRADE: LOW–MODERATE), limited to diabetic cohorts. When cost-per-MACE-prevented and cost-per-dementia-case-prevented were modelled, RZV dominated across all base-case analyses given its two-dose durability (≥ 11 years) versus requirement for indefinite daily pharmacotherapy. Conclusion: In adults aged ≥ 50 years across the general population, RZV is a non-inferior for MACE prevention in the general adult population and demonstrates superior, HIGH-certainty evidence for dementia prevention at a fraction of the cost, with a one-time two-dose regimen. A layered prevention strategy combining RZV (all adults ≥ 50 year) with pharmacotherapy (when metabolically indicated) offers the greatest absolute benefit. Dedicated head-to-head platform trials co-powered for MACE and dementia are urgently warranted and for dementia prevention is superior, longevity intervention relative to SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA for MACE and cognitive endpoint prevention. The vaccine’s unique mechanism breadth, population generalizability, adherence simplicity, and health-economic profile represent compelling arguments for guideline integration as a formal longevity strategy. Landmark randomised trials co-powered for cardiovascular and dementia co-primary outcomes are urgently warranted.

Article activity feed