A Person-Centered Mixed-Methods Analysis of Third-Party Disability Among Family Caregivers of Post-Stroke Disabled Older Adults: Identifying Modifiable Determinants for Tailored Support

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Long-term care for post-stroke disabled older adults places family caregivers at high risk of severe third-party disability (TPD). Prior research has predominantly used single quantitative or qualitative designs, with a lack of integrated mixed-methods studies. This study explored TPD determinants in these caregivers to inform evidence-based personalized interventions. Methods A convergent mixed-methods design was used. From January to November 2025, 796 caregiver-patient dyads were conveniently sampled from two tertiary hospitals in Shanghai. Data were collected using a sociodemographic and caregiving-related questionnaire, the Third-Party Disability Assessment Scale for Family Caregivers of Post-Stroke Disabled Older Adults (TPDAS-FCPSD), the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Multivariate stepwise linear regression was performed for quantitative data analysis. In December 2025, 23 caregivers were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews, with thematic analysis for coding. From January to February 2026, a joint display approach integrated quantitative and qualitative findings. Results Caregivers had a mean age of 56.1 ± 14.4 years (57.5% female) and post-stroke disabled older adults 68.0 ± 8.2 years (68.8% male); nearly 70% of the latter had moderate-to-severe disability. The mean TPDAS-FCPSD score was 34.76 ± 18.15. Quantitative analyses identified two independent TPD risk factors (disability severity among post-stroke disabled older adults, caregiver depressive symptoms) and three key protective factors (number of co-caregivers, social support, resilience); Caregiver demographics and simplified coping style showed no significant associations. Qualitative analyses further revealed unmeasured contributors: combined physical-speech dysfunction burden, environmental barriers, inadequate health services and person-care demand mismatch. Integrated findings confirmed qualitative results expanded quantitative observations by clarifying social support structure, physical-speech impairment synergies and care fitness mismatch. Co-caregivers protected all four TPD dimensions; social support influenced all dimensions, depressive symptoms and total disability affected the first three, and sibling number only impacted environmental adaptation. Conclusions TPD in family caregivers of post-stroke disabled older adults stems from complex multidimensional interactions of caregiver traits, clinical status of post-stroke disabled older adults, social support and environmental factors. This mixed-methods study fully identifies TPD’s influencing factors and mechanisms, providing theoretical and practical evidence to reduce caregiver burden, optimize home-based care models and advance healthy aging.

Article activity feed