Spatiotemporal analysis of spatial heterogeneity and mechanism reweighting in housing vacancy regimes after COVID-19

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Empirical studies often treat housing vacancy as a static correlate of local conditions, underemphasizing dynamic mechanisms that vary across space and shift under shocks. We reframe vacancy as a regime-structured process in which core–periphery hierarchies shape both local effects and cross-boundary spillovers. Focusing on the Tokyo Metropolitan Area, we ask whether the COVID-19 period disrupted the core–periphery regime structure or instead reweighted pre-existing mechanisms. Using municipality-level data from Japan’s Housing and Land Survey (HLS) for 290 municipalities in 2018 and 2023, we combine exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) with cross-sectional Spatial Durbin Models and a two-period panel SDM with municipality and year fixed effects. \(\:Post\times\:X\) and \(\:Post\times\:WX\) interactions identify post-period parameter shifts and decompose direct and spillover effects, separating within-municipality change from time-invariant heterogeneity. Results reveal persistent spatial clustering and selectively reweighted core–periphery, regime-specific mechanisms, with demographic pressure dominating the periphery and economic centrality coupled with asset-recycling capacity governing the core, contradicting a generalized “urban exodus” narrative. Social facilities exhibit a regime-contingent pattern: they operate as vacancy buffers in the periphery, whereas in the core their association shifts toward spillover-linked vacancy propagation. Meanwhile, the buffering role of pre-1981 housing stock weakens in 2023 relative to 2018, consistent with intensified quality-based sorting. Post-period shifts are largely spillover-driven, underscoring cross-boundary externalities. Overall, COVID-19 did not erase the regime hierarchy but induced asymmetric parameter reweighting. The study contributes a transferable, spillover-aware framework for diagnosing vacancy change and designing regime-targeted governance in aging and shrinking metropolises.

Article activity feed