Right Ventricular Function Across Different Respiratory Support Strategies in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is increasingly recognized in acute respiratory failure. Hypoxaemia, hypercapnia, acidosis, pulmonary vascular involvement and positive-pressure respiratory support may increase pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and RV afterload, thereby impairing RV performance. However, the haemodynamic effects of non-invasive respiratory support strategies in severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) outside the ICU remain insufficiently characterized. Objectives: To assess, in patients with severe CAP (Pneumonia Severity Index - PSI - IV and V): (1) the association between oxygenation mode and RV systolic performance (Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion - TAPSE, and lateral Tissue Doppler imaging - TDI) and (2) the relationship between oxygenation mode and Length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: Single-centre prospective observational study with consecutive enrolment of adult patients with severe CAP (PSI IV-V, according to ATS/IDSA - American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America - severity criteria) hospitalized in an internal medicine ward. The initial respiratory support strategy was selected in the emergency setting among NIV-PSV [Pressure Support Ventilation], HFNC, and Venturi Mask according to the patient's gas-exchange and acid-base profile; complete transthoracic echocardiography was then performed on ward admission while patients remained on the initially assigned device and settings, before any ward-driven modification of respiratory settings. The diagnostic etiological work-up comprised blood and sputum samples for cultures and multiplex nasopharyngeal viral/atypical PCR assays. Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled (NIV = 21, HFNC = 22, Venturi mask = 27). All patients had bilateral multilobar consolidations and pleural effusions. The predominant etiology was viral/atypical bacteria: human metapneumovirus A/B (30%), rhinovirus (30%), HPIV - Human parainfluenza virus − (20%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (20%). RV systolic parameters significantly varied between oxygenation modalities (p < 0.001). Patients on NIV showed the worst RV performance (TAPSE 1.16 ± 0.19 cm; TDI 6.02 ± 0.73 cm/s), while patients on a Venturi mask had better RV systolic performance (TAPSE 1.74 ± 0.33 cm; TDI 10.12 ± 2.28 cm/s). LOS was considerably longer in NIV and HFNC patients than in Venturi mask patients (28.4 ± 3.0 vs 27.4 ± 2.9 vs 14.7 ± 3.7 days; p < 0.001). In multivariate linear regression analysis, age and pattern of respiratory support (NIV/HFNC vs Venturi) were both independently associated with prolonged LOS. Conclusions: In this cohort, pressure-generating respiratory support modalities were associated with poorer RV systolic indices and longer hospitalization. Because the study specifically evaluated RV systolic function - and not RV failure or RV-pulmonary artery uncoupling - and because echocardiography was performed after respiratory support had already been selected and started, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating associations that may reflect both underlying disease severity and support-related haemodynamic effects.

Article activity feed