Imbalanced Self–Other Mentalizing as a Marker of Psychopathology: Transdiagnostic Associations in Clinical and Community Samples

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Mentalizing is a multidimensional capacity, and imbalance between self- and other-focused components may represent a transdiagnostic vulnerability to psychopathology. Across two studies, we used a person-centered clustering approach to identify profiles based on self-mentalizing, other-mentalizing, and motivation to mentalize, and examined their associations with personality functioning, maladaptive personality traits, and a broad spectrum of symptoms. Study 1 included community adults (N = 530; 51.5% women, 48.1% men, 0.4% other; M_age = 47.4 years, SD = 12.4, range = 30–97; race/ethnicity: Polish/White European). Two profiles emerged: a relatively balanced profile and a lower, self-imbalanced profile characterized by reduced self-mentalizing and elevated personality dysfunction, depression, and anxiety (η²p = .30). Study 2 included individuals seeking outpatient group psychotherapy (N = 123; 66.7% women, 33.3% men; M_age = 32.7 years, SD = 9.55, range = 18–58; race/ethnicity: Polish/White European). Two imbalanced profiles differing in severity were identified; the more impaired profile showed greater personality dysfunction, narcissistic antagonism, hostile attributions, avoidant attachment, and lower agentic narcissism (η²p = .29). Across both studies, a novel Self–Other Mentalizing Imbalance Index (SOMI) was consistently related to general psychopathology. These findings highlight the transdiagnostic significance of self–other mentalizing imbalance as a potential treatment target.

Article activity feed