Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Gastrointestinal Neoplasm Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background The potential carcinogenic effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remain controversial, particularly regarding site-specific gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the relationship between SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of GI neoplasms in patients with T2DM. Materials and methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science to March 17, 2025, for RCTs in T2DM comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or another active comparator. The primary outcome was GI neoplasms; secondary, prespecified site-specific neoplasms (esophageal, gastric, hepatic, pancreatic, colorectal, rectal, biliary). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in Stata 17.0, using fixed- or random-effects models according to the heterogeneity. Prespecified subgroups included agents, dose, exposure duration (≤ 52, 52–104, > 104 weeks), age, body mass index (BMI), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results In a pooled analysis of 49 RCTs (n = 49,054), SGLT2 inhibitors therapy was not associated with the overall risk of GI neoplasm (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84–1.44; p = 0.46; I² = 0%). Site-specific analyses were likewise null for esophageal (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.37–3.45), gastric (1.20, 0.65–2.23), hepatic (0.62, 0.31–1.22), pancreatic (0.93, 0.52–1.66), colonic (1.28, 0.78–2.08), colorectal (0.76, 0.27–2.17), and rectal neoplasms (0.98, 0.49–1.97), with all p-values > 0.05. Subgroup analyses by agents (e.g., canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin), baseline age, BMI, HbA1c, treatment duration, and dose were also non-significant (all p > 0.05). Approximately half of the trials had follow-up of one year or less, limiting our ability to evaluate long-term risk. Conclusions This comprehensive meta-analysis indicates that SGLT2 inhibitor therapy is not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal neoplasms in patients with T2DM across the follow-up durations evaluated, with consistent findings across pharmacologic subclasses.