Clinical Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Title : Clinical Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Purpose: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) modalities and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as adjuncts to non-surgical mechanical debridement for peri-implantitis management. Materials and Methods: An electronic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2025. Meta-analyses were performed for Probing Depth (PD), Bleeding on Probing (BOP), Plaque Index (PI), and Radiographic Marginal Bone Loss (RMBL) at approximately 6 months (range 3–9 months). Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Fifteen RCTs (644 patients; 742 implants) met the inclusion criteria. Adjunctive laser therapy was associated with significant reductions in PD (MD − 0.34 mm; 95% CI − 0.67 to − 0.01; p = 0.044), BOP (MD − 0.28; 95% CI − 0.53 to − 0.03; p = 0.03), and PI (MD − 0.44; 95% CI − 0.55 to − 0.33; p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed for RMBL (MD 0.16 mm; 95% CI − 0.24 to 0.55; p = 0.43). Substantial heterogeneity was present for PD (I² = 91.3%) and PI (I² = 86%). Conclusions: Adjunctive LLLT, particularly Er,Cr:YSGG and aPDT, improves short-term clinical outcomes in non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment. Clinical effectiveness is highly dependent on laser modality and applied protocol, highlighting the need for standardized, evidence-based treatment protocols.

Article activity feed