Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Myocarditis in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Presentation, Management, and Outcomes

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis (ICI-M) is a rare but life-threatening toxicity. This systematic review synthesizes the current evidence on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, management strategies, and outcomes of ICI-M to guide clinical practice. Methods We systematically searched PubMed from inception to January, 2026 for studies reporting on ICI-M in cancer patients. Data on patient demographics, clinical features, diagnostic findings, treatment, and outcomes were extracted. The risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools. Results 43 studies were included. ICI-M predominantly affected older adults (median age 65–74 years) with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell carcinoma. The highest risk was associated with combination ICI therapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4). Clinical presentation ranged from asymptomatic biomarker elevation to fulminant heart failure, with a high frequency of concurrent myositis. Key diagnostic findings included elevated troponin (> 90% of cases), ECG abnormalities, and reduced global longitudinal strain on echocardiography. Management universally involved ICI discontinuation and high-dose corticosteroids. Second-line immunosuppression (e.g., IVIG, infliximab, abatacept) was used in refractory cases. Despite treatment, mortality remained high (25–50%). Poor prognostic factors included high troponin levels, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and conduction abnormalities. Conclusion ICI-M is a severe complication with high mortality. Early recognition via proactive monitoring, prompt diagnosis using a multi-modal approach, and immediate, aggressive immunosuppression are critical. Future research should focus on predictive biomarkers and randomized trials to optimize management.

Article activity feed