The Neuro-Circular Optotype (NCO): optimizing visual acuity assessment via isotropic spatial-frequency tuning and cortical sparsity

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: To introduce and evaluate the Neuro-Circular Optotype (NCO), a filled-disk visual acuity stimulus with a single calibrated radial gap designed to align more closely with early visual coding principles than conventional optotypes. Methods: Thirty healthy adults (mean age \((24.5 \pm 3.2)\) years) completed adaptive forced-choice acuity testing with Tumbling E, Landolt C, and NCO. NCO and Landolt C were tested in an eight-alternative forced-choice format, whereas Tumbling E was tested in a four-alternative forced-choice format. Thresholds were estimated using a 3-down--1-up staircase and defined as the mean of the final six reversals. Additional experiments assessed recognition accuracy under reduced contrast and Gaussian blur. A computational model consisting of a difference-of-Gaussians retinal/LGN stage and an oriented V1 filter bank was used to compare sparsity and orientation selectivity across optotypes. Results: NCO yielded better mean acuity thresholds (\((-0.08 \pm 0.05)\) \logmar) than Landolt C (\((-0.01 \pm 0.06)\) \logmar) and Tumbling E (\((0.04 \pm 0.08)\) \logmar). Compared with Tumbling E, the NCO advantage was significant (\((p<0.001)\), Cohen's \((d=1.2)\)); compared with Landolt C, the difference also remained significant (\((p<0.05)\), \((d=0.6)\)). Under degraded viewing, NCO maintained the highest accuracy, including \((75.8%)\) at 20% contrast and \((71.2%)\) with Gaussian blur (\((\sigma=2)\) pixels). Tumbling E showed orientation-dependent anisotropy, whereas NCO did not. The computational model suggested that NCO evoked sparser and more orientation-concentrated responses than the comparison optotypes. Conclusion: A filled circular optotype with isotropically distributed gap orientations may provide a more robust and neurophysiologically aligned probe of visual resolution than legacy optotypes. Further validation in clinical populations and against standard chart-based outcomes is warranted.

Article activity feed