Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients with concurrent high ischemic and bleeding risk after drug-eluting stent implantation
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who have concurrent high ischemic and high bleeding risk represent a common but understudied group after percutaneous coronary intervention. Evidence guiding P2Y₁₂ inhibitor selection in this setting remains limited. This study compared ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ACS patients meeting OPT-BIRISK dual high-risk criteria after drug-eluting stent implantation. Methods In this retrospective analysis of a single-center, real-world PCI registry, patients with ACS undergoing new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation between March 2019 and March 2022 were included. Patients meeting both high ischemic risk and high bleeding risk criteria according to the OPT-BIRISK standard were identified and classified by P2Y₁₂ inhibitor prescribed at discharge. Propensity score overlap weighting adjusted for confounding. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 months. Results Of 30,562 ACS patients, 22,012 (72.0%) met dual high-risk criteria. The final cohort comprised 20,213 patients (ticagrelor, 4,563 [22.6%]; clopidogrel, 15,650 [77.4%]). NACE risk was similar between groups (4.58% vs 5.21%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.23; P = 0.568). Ticagrelor was not associated with a significant reduction in ischemic events (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.12; P = 0.333), but was associated with a higher risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding (2.17% vs 1.57%; aHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.77; P = 0.009). In exploratory subgroup analysis, ticagrelor was associated with higher net adverse clinical events in patients aged 75 years or older (P for interaction = 0.04). Conclusions In ACS patients with concurrent high ischemic and high bleeding risk undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation, discharge ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with higher bleeding risk without a significant reduction in NACE or ischemic events compared with clopidogrel. These observational findings support individualized P2Y₁₂ inhibitor selection and warrant prospective confirmation.