The Universal Access Paradox: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Treated Net Ownership and Utilization Discrepancies among Pregnant Women in Nkoranza South District, Ghana

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Malaria in pregnancy remains a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. While long-lasting insecticidal treated nets are highly efficacious and cost-effective, consistent utilization often falls short of programmatic targets even when ownership is high. This study evaluated factors associated with the access to and utilization of these nets among pregnant women in Bonsu Sub-Municipality, Ghana. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 purposively selected pregnant women. Structured questionnaires and direct observation of the sleeping environment were used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge levels, and usage practices. Results Access was near-universal, with 98.3% of respondents obtaining nets primarily through antenatal care clinics. However, a significant "Universal Access Paradox" was observed: while ownership was nearly 100%, only 43.3% of respondents had their nets correctly hung and in active use. Significant knowledge deficits were identified, with 45.8% of women incorrectly believing the insecticide was effective for only one year. Furthermore, 65.0% reported itchiness as a major adverse effect, contributing to a 35.0% non-utilization rate among owners. Conclusions The ownership-utilization gap is driven by a knowledge-efficacy deficit and physical discomforts rather than supply-side barriers. Consistent biological protection is hindered by "perceived obsolescence" of the nets and a lack of pre-emptive counseling regarding transient side effects. Limitations include the small purposive sample size and the cross-sectional design, which captures only a temporal snapshot of behavior and may be subject to social desirability bias in self-reported data. The outlook for future work necessitates a shift from passive distribution to a "Distribution Plus" model that prioritizes longitudinal behavioral tracking, male partner engagement, and the development of low-irritant insecticide coatings to ensure consistent person-nights of protected sleep.

Article activity feed