An Integrated Multi-Compartment Biomarker Ecosystem for the Discrimination of True Tumor Progression from Treatment Effect in High-Grade Glioma: Pooled Analysis of Seven Multicenter Prospective Studies (n = 212)

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Distinguishing true tumor progression from treatment effect—encompassing pseudoprogression (PsP) and radiation necrosis—remains one of the most pressing and unresolved challenges in high-grade glioma (HGG) management. Conventional contrast-enhanced MRI is frequently ambiguous in the post-chemoradiation period, and blood–brain barrier dynamics constrain single-compartment liquid biopsy assays. We hypothesized that an integrated multi-compartment biomarker ecosystem would overcome these limitations. Methods Pooled analysis of seven multicenter prospective studies (n = 212; 140 newly diagnosed, 72 recurrent; 160 IDH-wildtype GBM, 52 other HGG). The ecosystem comprised plasma cfDNA methylation profiling (EPIC 850K array), paired CSF/plasma data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry proteomics, multiparametric MRI radiomics with ComBat harmonization, and a stacked AI ensemble classifier. Ground truth: histopathological confirmation in 67% of cases (n = 142); pre-specified radiographic consensus (independent adjudication, modified RANO, ≥6-month follow-up) in 33% (n = 70). A plasma-only ecosystem variant (no CSF) was pre-specified for the subgroup without CSF availability. Feature selection stability was assessed by outer-fold selection frequency across nested cross-validation. The dynamic biomarker axis is reported as an exploratory analysis. Results The full ecosystem achieved AUC 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.96), sensitivity 91.5%, and specificity 84.1% (Table 2). In the sensitivity analysis restricted to histopathologically confirmed cases (n = 142), AUC was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83–0.95), confirming that performance was not substantially dependent on radiographically assigned ground truth. The plasma-only ecosystem achieved AUC 0.86. Median lead-time over radiographic consensus was 6.2 weeks. Ten of 32 retained features demonstrated ≥80% fold-selection stability. Proteomic myeloid inflammation markers (IL-6, CXCL1) were enriched in treatment effect; correlation with cfDNA-estimated TMB (r ≈ 0.42) is reported as hypothesis-generating. The dynamic biomarker axis (exploratory, n = 89 longitudinal cases) resolved 76% of cross-sectionally indeterminate cases and requires prospective validation. Conclusions This integrated ecosystem achieves robust internal performance for treatment effect discrimination in HGG. The histopathologically confirmed sensitivity analysis, plasma-only model, feature stability data, and formal dynamic axis algorithm address key methodological concerns. External prospective validation is the essential and pre-planned next step.

Article activity feed