Safety and efficacy of semaglutide for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects about 30.2% of the world and can progress from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis, contributing substantially to mortality and disability-adjusted life years. Because no FDA-approved pharmacologic therapy exists, sustained weight loss and exercise remain the principal effective options. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has shown potential benefits; therefore, we conducted a PRISMA- and PROSPERO-aligned systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety in adults with NAFLD/NASH. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to January 29, 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing oral or injectable semaglutide with placebo or another intervention; screening was performed in Rayyan. Efficacy outcomes included changes in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and complete NASH resolution when reported; safety outcomes included adverse events, particularly diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and nasopharyngitis. Data were synthesized in R (v4.4.2) with p<0.05. Effect estimates were pooled as standardized mean differences for transaminases, using random-effects models to account for clinical diversity. NASH-resolution data were insufficient for meaningful pooled analysis. Six trials comprising 1,980 participants were included. Semaglutide significantly reduced ALT (SMD −0.74, 95% CI −1.11 to −0.36; p=0.0001) and AST (SMD −0.63, 95% CI −1.01 to −0.24; p=0.0014). However, semaglutide increased gastrointestinal adverse events, including diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Overall, semaglutide improves liver transaminases in adults with NAFLD/NASH but at the cost of higher rates of common adverse effects; larger and longer trials with standardized histologic and clinical endpoints are needed to define net benefit.

Article activity feed