Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Complications after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) with Locking Plate for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates remains a widely used head-preserving treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures in adults. While short-term outcomes are well documented, long-term functional performance, complication burden, and implant survivorship beyond five years remain poorly defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise long-term (≥ 5 years) functional outcomes, complication rates, and reoperation rates following locking plate ORIF for proximal humerus fractures. Methods A protocol-registered (PROSPERO CRD420251156067) systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language randomized and non-randomized clinical studies reporting ≥ 5-year follow-up after ORIF with plate fixation for two-, three-, or four-part proximal humerus fractures in adults. Functional outcomes (Constant–Murley, DASH, UCLA, and Oxford Shoulder Score), complications, and reoperation rates were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. Results Twelve studies encompassing 1,007 patients met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from 5 to nearly 15 years. Pooled analyses demonstrated no statistically significant long-term differences in Constant–Murley, DASH, or UCLA scores, although the Oxford Shoulder Score favored ORIF (mean difference 5.00; 95% CI 1.31–8.69). Long-term complications were common, particularly avascular necrosis (5–23%), screw penetration (9–15%), stiffness, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (5–16%). Meta-analysis suggested a lower pooled risk of reoperation (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.10–0.70) and complications (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.04–0.12), though heterogeneity was substantial across all outcomes (I² 91–100%). Overall certainty of evidence was rated very low. Conclusion Locking plate ORIF for proximal humerus fractures provides acceptable but highly variable long-term functional outcomes, with a considerable burden of late complications and secondary procedures. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection, meticulous surgical technique, and long-term follow-up. High-quality prospective studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to better define the durability of ORIF in this challenging injury.

Article activity feed