Impact of food-simulating liquids on the surface degradation of conventional, CAD/CAM-milled, and 3D-printed denture base materials

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Digital technologies have introduced CAD/CAM-milled and 3D-printed denture base materials as alternatives to conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). However, evidence on their surface degradation under simulated oral conditions remains limited. This study evaluated the effect of food-simulating liquids on surface degradation of heat-cured PMMA, CAD/CAM-milled, and 3D-printed denture base resins over time. Methods A total of 225 specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm) were fabricated from three denture base materials (75 per material): heat-cured PMMA (HC), Ivotion Base CAD/CAM-milled PMMA (IB), and SprintRay Apex Base 3D-printed resin (SR). Fifteen specimens per material were allocated to five testing conditions (n = 15): control (air; AR), distilled water (DW), ethanol solution (ES), citric acid (CA), and heptane (HE). Specimens were evaluated after 1 week (T1) and 1 month (T2). Surface roughness (Ra, µm) was measured using a profilometer, and hardness (VHN) was assessed by Vickers hardness testing. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, and paired-samples t-test (p < 0.05). Results SR demonstrated the lowest surface roughness (T1: 0.099–0.105; T2: 0.096–0.121), whereas IB generally exhibited the highest values, particularly in CA (T1: 0.237 ± 0.043; T2: 0.241 ± 0.038). At T2, DW and CA significantly increased roughness of HC (up to 0.232 ± 0.030 in DW) (p < 0.05). For hardness, HC showed the highest values overall, especially in HE (T1: 20.32 ± 0.94; T2: 20.66 ± 0.31), while IB demonstrated lower hardness, particularly in ES at T2 (10.97 ± 0.39). ES markedly reduced hardness of SR. HE produced no significant changes over time. Conclusions Surface degradation was material- and medium-dependent. The 3D-printed resin exhibited superior smoothness, whereas conventional PMMA showed greater hardness. Acidic and alcoholic environments adversely affected surface properties, highlighting the importance of material selection according to patients’ diet.

Article activity feed