Comparative Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Pain Management Interventions in Neonates: A Cross- Sectional Observational Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Neonates in intensive care units undergo numerous painful procedures. Non-pharmacological interventions offer safe approaches to reduce procedural pain, but comparative studies evaluating their relative effectiveness are limited, particularly in low-resource settings. Methods: We enrolled 240 neonates requiring heel lancing for blood glucose monitoring. Neonates were allocated to three intervention groups: breastfeeding, kangaroo mother care (KMC), and oral dextrose. Pain was assessed using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) at baseline and at 2, 10, and 120 seconds post-procedure. Results: All three interventions effectively reduced procedural pain. Mean NIPS scores at 2 seconds were 2.17±1.76 for breastfeeding, 2.29±1.69 for KMC, and 2.61±1.72 for oral dextrose group (p=0.25). Complete pain relief (NIPS=0 at 10 seconds) differed significantly across groups: 83.8% for breastfeeding, 78.8% for KMC, and 65.0% for oral dextrose (p=0.016). However, after adjusting for age and birth weight, KMC showed lower pain scores than breastfeeding, though the difference was not significant. Conclusion: All three non-pharmacological methods were effective in reducing procedural pain. Between-group differences in mean pain scores were not statistically significant. These methods offer safe, accessible options for procedural pain management in neonates.

Article activity feed