Consensus and Gaps in AI Ethics: An Integrated Analysis of 200 Guidelines Reveals Core Principles and Emerging Themes

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study analyzes 200 AI ethics guidelines (2014-2022) from 46 countries using two complementary methods: statistical analysis of 17 predefined principles and BERTopic modeling for emergent themes. We found broad consensus on three 1 core principles: transparency (82.5%), reliability (78.0%), and fairness (75.5%). However, critical gaps exist: children’s rights appear in only 6% of documents, labor rights in 19.5%, and sustainability in 22.0%. Regional variations reveal European emphasis on data protection, North American focus on corporate commitment , and Asian attention to technology governance. Temporal analysis shows human-centeredness (+2.2% annually) and corporate commitment (+2.4% annually) as emerging trends. These findings offer benchmarks for policymakers and organizations developing AI ethics frameworks, while highlighting urgent gaps requiring attention.

Article activity feed