Health-Related Quality of Life Among Blue-Collar and White-Collar Workers at a Thermal Power Plant

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction- Occupational stress has emerged as one of the foremost health concerns. Workplace environment, ergonomics, physical and psychosocial factors affect workers' health. Methods - This cross-sectional study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the WHOQoL-Bref among blue-collar and white-collar workers using hierarchical regression modelling, selected via OpenEpi random sampling. Sociodemographic, occupational profiles, anthropometric, and musculoskeletal (MSK) pains using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Result - Blue (70.4%), and white-collar (29.6%) groups were comparable in age, sex, marital status, and illness. White-collar workers had higher education and obesity rates. blue-collar workers endured longer shifts (> 6 hours: 85.9%), income insufficiency (84.6%), and low autonomy, yet reported fewer MSK pains; white-collar workers showed higher neck (65%), shoulder (58.8%), wrist/arm (63.6%, p = 0.017), and back pains, suggesting ergonomic/stress vulnerabilities despite advantages. Occupationally, blue-collar workers endured longer shifts (> 6 hours: 85.9%, p < 0.001), income insufficiency (84.6%, p = 0.009), and low autonomy, yet reported fewer MSK pains; white-collar workers showed higher neck (65%, p < 0.001), shoulder (58.8%, p = 0.006), wrist/arm (63.6%, p = 0.017), and back pains, suggesting ergonomic/stress vulnerabilities despite advantages. Hierarchical linear regression model explained 40–44% variance in HRQoL domains. Key predictors included married status (positive social p < 0.001), graduate education (negative psychological p = 0.030), > 21 years’ experience (psychological health; p = 0.023), white-collar role (physical health; p = 0.047), long hours (mixed effects), high autonomy/income sufficiency (environmental health; p < 0.01), lower back pain (physical p < 0.001), and obesity (psychological p = 0.050). Conclusion - Involving workers, integrating ergonomics modification with work organization, pain interventions for workers specially focused on aging workers, quality, and productivity, along with a multisectoral public health approach, ensures successful interventions.

Article activity feed