Evaluation of Effectiveness of Two Different Retreatment Systems in Removal of Obturation Materials From Curved Canals: An in-Vitro Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: The primary objective of endodontic retreatment is to remove the contamination of the root canals, thus facilitating the recovery of periapical tissues and allowing tissue healing. Aim of the study: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the two retreatment rotary systems Pro-Taper retreatment system and Neo-Endo retreatment system in the removal of obturating materials from curved canals. Materials and Methods: Forty (mesio-buccal) root canals of upper or lower molars were designated for the study and prepared using Pro-Taper Gold. Then canals were separated into two groups (A and B) based on the type of sealer. Twenty canals in group A were filled with (AH Plus sealer), whereas 20 canals in group B were filled using (Cera-Seal) bio-ceramic sealer. Each group was divided into two subgroups, subgroups (Ⅰ and Ⅱ) (n=10 for each) based on the retreatment method: Pro-Taper and Neo-Endo retreatment systems. Results: The analysis between groups revealed statistically significant difference exists between the two evaluated sealers, bio-ceramic sealers and AH Plus sealer. Higher value of obturating materials remnants was recorded in canals filled with AH plus and retreated by Neo-endo rotary system. While the lowest mean value was measured in canals filled with bio-ceramic sealer and reshaped using the Pro-Taper rotary system. Conclusion: Pro-Taper retreatment system is more efficient in removal of the obturating materials. AH plus remnants can be eliminated easily compared to Cera-Seal sealer.

Article activity feed