A Re-exploration of the Essence of Individual Democracy under the Competitive Exclusion Principle

Different social, ethnic, and organizational groups interpret democracy in diverse ways, leading to myriad conclusions. This diversity stems from social factors, such as knowledge, speculation, experience, and social background. These factors allow each person to believe their own ideas are consistent. Democracy is a popular global issue and is often invoked in political conflicts. Western views on human rights and self-justifying arguments further confuse and complicate the understanding of democracy’s essence. This paper uses questionnaire surveys to explore public demands for democracy in relation to spatial structure, resources, time, boundaries, tensions, and political resources. It highlights the diversity, characteristics, and regional differences of democracy, distinguishing variations in quantity, scale, and location. Clarifying these points helps settle debates about democracy’s essence. The paper suggests that each group should focus on its own democratic space and resources, avoiding comparisons without boundaries. Otherwise, unnecessary problems may arise.