Behavioral Adaptation and Risk Compensation in Horizontal Curve Crashes: A Multidimensional Accident Cost Rate Framework

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Horizontal curve crashes represent a major road safety challenge worldwide. This study presents a multidimensional accident cost rate (ACR) framework for identifying high-risk horizontal curves using infrastructure, pavement friction, environmental conditions, and behavioral adaptation indicators. We developed a data-driven pipeline analyzing 2,563 km of Austrian rural roads over 12 years (2012–2023), combining police-reported crashes with RoadSTAR geometry/friction data and traffic exposure. The Accident Cost Rate (ACR) metric was applied at section and network levels, with a robust Hotspot_50 rule (ACR section > 1.5 × ACR road ) for prioritization. We employed bootstrap intervals, effect sizes, Spearman's correlation, and k-means clustering to derive actionable risk profiles. Among 3,333 curve crashes, we identified a behavioral adaptation paradox: highest accident costs occurred under dry pavement and daylight conditions. Curvature showed strong positive association with ACR (ρ = 0.634, p < 0.001), while AADT was negatively correlated (ρ = -0.508, p < 0.001). Counterintuitively, high friction (µ > 0.60) correlated with increased ACR, suggesting risk compensation. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct risk profiles enabling targeted interventions. The framework provides transportation agencies with a transferable, computationally efficient tool for cost-weighted safety prioritization. Results demonstrate that behavioral adaptation can offset infrastructural safety gains, necessitating behavior-aware countermeasures in Vision Zero strategies.

Article activity feed