Evaluating the Effectiveness of CO₂ Curing Versus Conventional Water Curing in Fly Ash–Blended Concrete
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of carbon dioxide (CO₂) curing in comparison with conventional water curing for concrete embedding coal fly ash as a partial replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement. Cement mortar cubes were prepared with varying fly ash replacement ratios (0–25%) and subjected to CO₂ curing for 6, 12, and 24 hours, as well as conventional water curing for up to 28 days. Compressive strength development, carbonation depth, and durability-related characteristics were assessed. The results demonstrate that CO₂ curing significantly enhances early-age compressive strength by accelerating carbonation reactions and refining the pore structure. Specimens subjected to 24 hours of CO₂ curing achieved strength levels comparable to those obtained after several days of conventional curing. An optimum fly ash replacement level of approximately 5% yielded comparable or improved strength under both curing regimes. At higher fly ash contents (≥15%), a reduction in strength was observed due to dilution of cementitious phases, although CO₂ curing partially mitigated this loss. Phenolphthalein testing confirmed effective carbonation penetration, indicating successful CO₂ sequestration within the cement matrix. The study concludes that integrating CO₂ curing with partial cement replacement using coal fly ash offers a viable pathway toward sustainable, low-carbon concrete with enhanced early-age performance.