ZINCPharmer-Based Identification of Multi-Target Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction: Pharmacophore Virtual Screening and Molecular Docking of Commercially Available Compounds

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects approximately 300 million men globally, with current phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors associated with cardiovascular complications, headache, and addiction potential. This study employed ZINCPharmer pharmacophore-based virtual screening to identify novel multi-target inhibitors from commercially available compounds addressing multiple ED pathophysiological pathways. Using established PDE-5 inhibitors as query templates, four hit compounds were evaluated through molecular docking against PDE-5, arginase, protein kinase C (PKC), and O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT). Compound 4 demonstrated superior multi-target binding performance with strongest PDE-5 affinity (-9.11 kcal/mol versus − 8.96 kcal/mol for sildenafil), exceptional O-GlcNAc transferase binding energy (-45.41 kcal/mol, surpassing sildenafil at -31.00 kcal/mol), and favorable PKC binding (-52.13 kcal/mol), indicating robust polypharmacological potential. Notably, its higher LD 50 value (1000 mg/kg) suggests wider therapeutic window compared to Compound 1 (380 mg/kg), despite two Lipinski violations and low gastrointestinal absorption requiring optimization. Compound 1 exhibited remarkably favorable arginase binding energy (-3.63 kcal/mol), zero Lipinski violations, high gastrointestinal absorption, non-blood-brain barrier permeability, and minimal CYP 450 inhibition. Toxicological predictions indicated hepatotoxicity for Compound 4 and nephrotoxicity for Compound 1, though both maintained favorable carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and cytotoxicity profiles. These findings establish Compound 4 as a particularly promising multi-target candidate warranting optimization, while Compound 1 offers complementary drug-like advantages. Both compounds address multifactorial ED pathophysiology more comprehensively than current single-mechanism therapies, establishing foundation for experimental validation and medicinal chemistry optimization.

Article activity feed