Educational Prompt Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale (Ed-PESS): Scale Development and Psychometric Validation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Pre-service teachers' confidence in designing pedagogically purposeful prompts for generative AI tools remains an underexamined construct in teacher education. This study developed and validated the Educational Prompt Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale for Pre-service Teachers (Ed-PESS) to address the absence of a psychometrically sound instrument measuring this domain. Scale development followed Boateng et al.'s three-phase framework, grounded in a systematic literature review and expert review procedures. Two independent samples of pre-service teachers were recruited: an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) sample (n = 300) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) sample (n = 305). EFA using principal axis factoring with Promax rotation produced a four-factor structure explaining 64.60% of total variance. CFA with Yuan-Bentler robust correction confirmed acceptable model fit. The final 26-item scale comprises four dimensions: Basic Prompt Engineering, Pedagogical Prompt Engineering, Ethical Prompting Practice, and Continuous Professional Development. Internal consistency was high across all subscales. The Ed-PESS provides a valid, reliable instrument for assessing prompt engineering self-efficacy in pre-service teacher education. It supports formative curriculum evaluation and targeted intervention design.

Article activity feed