Paradoxical Linkage between Mental Health and Social Implications of COVID-19 crisis in Gay, Bisexual Men and transgenders in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Results of Survey among the Hornet Mobile App Users

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background. Limited data exists on how COVID-19 restrictions have affected LGBT in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) region. Methods. It was conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2020, involving 5,037 Hornet users in EECA. Results and discussion. A part of the sample belongs to vulnerable groups (lower social status, racial/ethnic minorities, etc). The economic circumstances of GBT were impacted: 21% lost at least 2/3 of income; 21% lost jobs; and 24% found themselves in extreme poverty. More vulnerable populations felt heavily struck (f. e. a food intake had been shortened among transgender people 41% vs 21% among cisgender ones). Despite the limitation of physical freedom and economic losses, the level of depression and anxiety did not exceed the bounds of mild deviations (PHQ-4: 4.7, 95% CI: 4.6–4.8). Conclusions. The data presented suggests the readiness of EECA GBT communities to face future crises.

Article activity feed