Assessing the Metric Reliability of NRTK-Based Surveying Systems for Multi-Scale Architectural Documentation: Experimental Tests and Real-World Applications

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Network Real-Time Kinematic (NRTK) correction services have lowered the barrier to georeferenced surveying by enabling centimetric GNSS positioning without deploying a local base station, but their “end-to-end” metric reliability in multi-sensor architectural workflows remains strongly dependent on platform-specific error source (Rizos 2002). This paper assesses the geometric consistency achievable when NRTK is used as the sole georeferencing backbone for multi-scale heritage documentation, combining a controlled benchmark with a real-world application on the survey of Villa Farsetti and its park in Santa Maria di Sala, Italy. The benchmark compares four NRTK-enabled platforms (geodetic GNSS, handheld SLAM system, UAV, and DSLR with RTK Hotshoe tagging) against a topographic reference. The field campaign replicates the same NRTK toolchain on the villa’s architectural envelope and landscape, while defining an independent reference via a static GNSS-supported control network and static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Quality assessment is designed around point-based check residuals, baseline/scale diagnostics, and dense cloud-to-cloud and M3C2 comparisons to TLS reference clouds (Besl et al. 1992). The study provides a practical, reproducible validation framework to decide when NRTK-only architectures can support 1:50–1:100 deliverables and when supplementary control is still required.

Article activity feed