Association Between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Liver Injury in Children with Epstein-Barr Virus Infection: A Retrospective Study with Incremental Predictive Value Assessment

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Liver injury is a common complication of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in children, yet reliable predictive biomarkers remain limited. Red blood cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV), an emerging inflammatory marker, has shown prognostic value in various infectious diseases but its role in EBV-related hepatic impairment is poorly characterized. Methods: This retrospective study included 123 hospitalized children with laboratory-confirmed EBV infection at Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital between July 2020 and December 2025. Liver injury was defined as ALT >80 U/L. The dose-response relationship between RDW-CV and liver injury was assessed using restricted cubic spline analysis. Multivariable logistic regression with progressive adjustment evaluated the independent association. Five variable selection methods (R², adjusted R², BIC, Mallows' Cp, LASSO,) integrated with clinical expertise identified nine predictors for model construction. The incremental value of RDW-CV was quantified by comparing AUC, NRI, and IDI between models with and without RDW-CV. Results: Of 123 patients, 48 (39.0%) developed liver injury. RDW-CV was significantly elevated in the liver injury group (13.6 ± 1.0% vs. 13.2 ± 0.8%, P = 0.046). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a significant linear association (P for overall = 0.007). In fully adjusted multivariable analysis, each 1% RDW-CV increment conferred threefold higher odds of liver injury ( OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.59–5.91, P= 0.001), with consistent effects across age and sex subgroups. The 9-predictor model including RDW-CV demonstrated superior discrimination compared to the model without RDW-CV (AUC: 0.800 vs. 0.718, P = 0.035; categorical NRI 0.274, P = 0.015; continuous NRI 0.617, P < 0.001; IDI 0.130, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the 9-predictor model showed adequate calibration (MAE = 0.059) and favorable net benefit in decision curve analysis (DCA). Conclusions: RDW-CV is an independent, robust predictor of liver injury in children with EBV infection. Incorporating RDW-CV into clinical prediction models significantly enhances risk stratification accuracy, supporting its potential as a routine adjunctive biomarker for early identification of hepatic complications.

Article activity feed