Long-term Outcomes After Wrap Versus Open Technique In Bentall Procedures: A Retrospective Cohort Study Of 1,478 Patients

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of wrap versus open Bentall procedures on patient survival and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: We reviewed 1,478 patients who underwent Bentall procedures between 2003 and 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on surgical technique: the wrap group (n = 1,274), and the open group (n = 204). Results: The median age was 53 (IQR:43.0–61.0), and 82.9 (%) were male. The wrap group had a higher prevalence of hypertension (39.8% vs. 30.9%; P = 0.019) and a smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (60 mm vs. 65 mm; P < 0.001). there was 4 (0.3%) early deaths in the wrap group and none in the open group. During a median follow-up period of 6.3 (IQR: 3.74–9.44) years, 108 patients died. The 10-year survival was 88.6% (95% CI: 83.1%–94.3%) in the open group and 90.8% (95% CI: 88.8%–93.0%) in the wrap group( P = 0.43). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed age, Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter Aortic Sinus Diameter, postoperative stroke, and Reoperation were independent predictors of long-term mortality. Surgical technique (wrap vs. open) had no impact on survival. Conclusion: There is no difference in survival following wrapping Bentall versus open Bentall.

Article activity feed