Inequitable Access to Risk-Appropriate Neonatal Care: Evidence from a Regionalized Perinatal System in Arkansas

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective Evaluate access to risk-appropriate neonatal care in Arkansas and examine associations of geography, hospital availability, and county-level maternity care access with birth triage, neonatal transfers, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) utilization. Study Design Population-based retrospective cohort study of all live births in Arkansas from 1/1/2014, through 12/31/2023. Linked birth certificate, hospital neonatal level, county maternity care access data were analyzed. Exposures included distance to nearest risk-appropriate facility and local hospital availability. Outcomes included birth and transfer triage, NICU utilization. Results Among 358,183 live births, 76.5% were over-triaged, 3.3% under-triaged, and 20.1% risk-appropriate. Under-triage was most common when nearest appropriate facility was distant (mean 51.2 miles). Transfers were predominantly over-triaged (82.4%). NICU utilization was highest in counties with greater maternity care access despite similar high-acuity birth rates. Conclusion Triage patterns were driven more by geography than clinical need, indicating opportunities to improve alignment between neonatal risk and site of care.

Article activity feed