Carbon burial outweighs the climate impact of methane emissions across global aquatic ecosystems
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Different aquatic ecosystems may have opposing effects on global climate acting as sources and/or sinks of greenhouse gases. The conversion of sediment organic carbon to the powerful greenhouse gas methane is a key indicator of the potential climate impact of a given ecosystem. Here, we assess the lifetime climatic role of aquatic ecosystems by contrasting methane (CH 4 ) emissions with long-term organic carbon burial. Global compilations revealed that the ecosystem-specific ratio of organic carbon burial (kg CO 2 ) to CH 4 emissions (kg CH 4 ) ranged from 20:1 in lakes to 2500:1 in continental shelves. Using 100-year sustained-flux global warming potential and a radiative balance model, we show that most ecosystems currently exhibit a net negative radiative balance (i.e., net cooling or a CO 2 -equivalent sink). The lifetime cooling effect per area was strongest in the coastal ocean and fjords. Freshwater ponds, lakes, and inland wetlands had lowest organic carbon burial to CH 4 emission ratios, requiring ~ 0-700 years after their establishment to shift from a positive to net negative radiative balance. All aquatic ecosystems gradually increase their net climate benefit via long-term enhancement of the ratio of carbon sequestration to CH 4 emissions. Most aquatic ecosystems will thus achieve negative radiative balance over their lifetime.