Investigating the Role of Serum IL-6 in Predicting Outcomes of B- Cell Depleting Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a pivotal role in autoimmune inflammation through its effects on B-cell differentiation, Th17 expansion, and regulatory T-cell suppression. Given ocrelizumab’s (OCR) mechanism of selective CD20 + B-cell depletion, baseline IL-6 levels have been hypothesized to predict disease activity and long-term outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the prognostic value of serum IL-6 in OCR-treated patients remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included 73 patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS, n = 30) or primary progressive MS (PPMS, n = 43) who initiated OCR at University Hospital Düsseldorf between 2018 and 2023. Baseline serum IL-6 was compared with 87 healthy controls (HC) and correlated with clinical, radiological, and biomarker outcomes over 24 months. Clinical endpoints included confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and relapse-associated worsening (RAW), alongside MRI activity and Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) and Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (sGFAP) levels. Between-group comparisons used Welch’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, paired longitudinal comparisons used paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and associations between baseline biomarkers and outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression, multivariable linear or logistic regression, and rank-based linear models for IL-6. Results: Baseline serum IL-6 levels showed no significant differences between the overall MS cohort and HC, nor between RRMS and PPMS subgroups. No baseline biomarker, including IL-6, sNfL, and sGFAP predicted disease activity. Longitudinal analysis under OCR revealed largely stable IL-6 concentrations but patients maintaining No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) showed 50% reduction in IL-6 at 12 months, whereas those with loss of NEDA-3 remained stable. Conclusion: Baseline serum IL-6 alone is insufficient to predict clinical or radiological outcomes in OCR-treated MS patients. However, the significant longitudinal decline specifically in stable patients suggests that IL-6 dynamics, rather than static baseline measures, may better reflect sustained therapeutic response. These findings underscore the limited utility of serum IL-6 alone as a biomarker and support further exploration of longitudinal, multiparametric approaches.

Article activity feed