Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Functional Constipation in School-Aged Children
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective To analyze the risk factors associated with functional constipation and to construct a corresponding risk prediction model in school-aged children. Methods In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 467 school-aged children who presented to the Constipation Clinic or Department of Child Health Care at Wuhan Children’s Hospital between January 2024 and May 2025. Participants were randomly allocated into a derivation cohort (n = 326) and an internal validation cohort (n = 141) in a 7:3 ratio. Children in the derivation cohort were classified as FC or healthy controls based on Rome IV criteria. Independent risk factors were identified through multivariable logistic regression. A nomogram prediction model was then developed using the R software based on the results of the multivariable analysis. Model discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), and calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. For internal validation, the predictive performance of the established nomogram was assessed on the independent validation cohort, which comprised 141 school-aged children with functional constipation. This assessment was based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with performance quantified by the area under the curve (AUC). Results Multivariable analysis identified the following independent risk factors for functional constipation in school-aged children: shorter duration of exclusive breastfeeding, absence of any toilet training, child's concern over lack of privacy during defecation, complete unwillingness to defecate at school, frequent complaints of school-related stress, and suboptimal daily parent-child interaction time (all P < 0.05). The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination in the derivation cohort (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.92; sensitivity 74%, specificity 86%) with good calibration. Performance remained robust in the validation cohort (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.78–0.90; sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%). Conclusions Incorporating key modifiable factors from type of infant feeding, toilet training, school environment, psychological adaptation, and parent-child interaction, the developed nomogram provides a simple, intuitive, and feasible clinical tool. It demonstrates good discriminative ability and predictive accuracy, offering a practical and actionable guide for the early identification of school-aged children at high risk of functional constipation and for informing targeted preventive interventions.