Standalone Smartphone Photorefraction: High Accuracy for Timely Myopia Screening

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Recent smartphone-based health technologies emphasize engineering, but evidence on standalone devices, without attachments, for detecting uncorrected refractive errors remains limited. Validation is essential for scalable vision screening in resource-limited settings. This study was conducted to validate smartphone-based eccentric photorefraction against open-field autorefraction and assess comparable performance under non-cycloplegic (dry) and cycloplegic (wet) conditions. Methods This diagnostic study (2022–2024), baseline for the Smartphone AI Refraction System (STARS), enrolled 948 Chinese children and adults (aged 6–43 years; mean [SD], 19.8 [9.03] years; spherical equivalent, − 12.50 to + 6.88 D) with clear media, excluding presbyopia, tropia, or nystagmus. This study was conducted at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optometry Research Clinic using convenience sampling. Participants underwent open-field autorefraction and smartphone photorefraction at 1 m distance under non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. We evaluated the refractive error agreement with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance for myopia worse than − 2.00 D (2021 AAPOS criteria) was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Results We analysed 5,350 non-cycloplegic and 4,919 cycloplegic eye photographs. Non-cycloplegic photorefraction demonstrated higher sensitivity (96%; 95% CI, 96–97) and specificity (83%; 95% CI, 81–85) for detecting significant myopia compared with cycloplegic photorefraction (91% (95% CI, 90–92); 79% (95% CI, 77–81)). ICCs were 0.77 (non-cycloplegic) and 0.67 (cycloplegic). Non-cycloplegic photorefraction also showed higher DOR than cycloplegic photorefraction. Conclusions Standalone smartphone photorefraction without external attachments offers high accuracy, particularly under noncycloplegic conditions, and supports large-scale refractive errors screening in underserved areas.

Article activity feed