Endophthalmitis Following Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background To evaluate the risk of endophthalmitis in glaucoma patients undergoing glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Methods This retrospective cohort study identified glaucoma patients utilzing TriNetX’s database who underwent GDD between 2004 and 2024 without a prior history of glaucoma surgery. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis estimated the cumulative incidence of endophthalmitis and a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates, was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) comparing outcomes between patients who underwent tube shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy. A scleral buckle (SB) cohort was added as a second comparator to GDD to contexulize infection risk related to hardware without bleb formation. Results The GDD cohort included 12,849 patients (mean age 62.7 ± 19 years), compared with 9,006 trabeculectomy patients (67.9 ± 14.1) and 3,097 SB patients (45.1 ± 18.7). After GDD surgery, the cumulative incidence of endophthalmitis was 0.82% at 1, 1.57% at 3, and 1.87% at 5 years, compared with 0.47%, 0.78%, and 0.96% following trabeculectomy, and 0.19%, 0.23%, and 0.39% following SB. In Cox models, there was no significant difference in hazard between GDD and trabeculectomy at any timepoint. However, GDD was associated with higher risk than SB at 30 days (aHR 5.43, CI: 1.28–23.08, 1 year (aHR 3.36, 95% CI 1.88–5.99) and 5 years (aHR 3.71, 95% CI 2.40–5.73). Conclusion Endophthalmitis is an uncommon but persistent risk after GDD surgery. Although long-term risk was comparable between GDD and trabeculectomy, GDD implantation carried a higher risk than SB.