Genomic diversity, antibiotic resistance, and maturation‑dependent adhesion of F18 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains in porcine intestinal cells

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strains expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae are major causes of neonatal and post‑weaning diarrhea in swine. Although epithelial maturation influences susceptibility in vivo, its impact on ETEC-host interactions remains poorly defined. This study characterizes the antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence traits of emerging F18 ETEC isolates using whole genome sequencing and a differentiated porcine intestinal cell model. Methods Three F18 strains (3EC1, 27EC1, 3247EC), a porcine F4 strain, and human ETEC H10407 were analyzed by comparative genomics for virulence factors, toxin genes, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed to verify AMR phenotype. Adhesion assays were performed using IPEC‑1, IPEC‑J2, and Caco‑2 cells conditioned to Early (6 days post‑confluence, DPC), Mid (9 DPC), and Late (16 DPC) maturation states. Transcription of F18‑binding receptors (FUT1, FUT2) was quantified by RT‑qPCR. Results IPEC‑1 cells exhibited significantly higher FUT1 and FUT2 expression than IPEC‑J2, corresponding to approximately two‑fold stronger adhesion by most F18 isolates. Strain 3EC1 showed a distinct adhesion peak at 9 DPC, approaching F4 levels, while F4 and H10407 consistently displayed the highest adhesion across all models. Genomic analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity among F18 strains in fimbrial loci, flagellin, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and antimicrobial resistance. Strain 3EC1 uniquely carried stx2e , and non‑classical EAST1 variants were detected in 3EC1 and 3247EC. All F18 isolates encoded hlyE and were β‑hemolytic; enhanced resistance to multiple antibiotics, especially 3247EC harbored 28 antimicrobial resistance genes. Conclusions The IPEC‑1/IPEC‑J2 maturation stages recapitulate age‑dependent susceptibility to ETEC, likely driven by FUT1/2 expression levels. The combination of strong adhesion, stx2e , and extensive antimicrobial resistance in F18 strains underscores their evolving virulence and supports this model as a refined platform for studying porcine ETEC pathogenesis.

Article activity feed